On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 04:26:24PM +0000, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > In subsurface we will disable git integration because "it's not ready yeat > in any way". What happens with gitg? There was a bunch of commits yesterday fixing some api incompatibilities. Another batch or two of like that and it should be ready. Zbyszek > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 7:21 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 01:31:36PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:46:06AM +0000, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > > > I've sent patch to fedora's pygit2. Subsurface in upstream supports > > 0.23.0, > > > > I will need some time to check what patches we need. Other packages as > > you > > > > said compiles with new libgit2. Only one package dependes on > > python-pygit2, > > > > I adressed a bug. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:46 PM Igor Gnatenko < > > i.gnatenko.brain@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > > > > <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 03:58:09PM +0000, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > > > > >> Hi, > > > > > >> > > > > > >> I'm planning today to update libgit2[0] and libgit2-glib[1] in > > Fedora 23 > > > > > >> and Fedora Rawhide to new version. API has changed, some functions > > > > > removed, > > > > > >> some has new/type changed parameters. Read more[2]. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Packages which needs rebuild (probably patches or updates needed): > > > > > > OK, and what happens if the patches turn out to be non-trivial > > > > > > and slow in being produced? I really think this kind of change > > should > > > > > > be done first using scratch builds of all dependent packages > > > > > > (or using a side tag if there are more than a handful of dependent > > > > > > packages). This way maintainers have time to respond in case > > > > > > upstream work is needed, and we don't get uninstallable > > > > > > packages in rawhide. > > > > > > > > > > > > Recent gdal update was similar. Some dependent packages require > > porting > > > > > > to the new APIs, nobody knows when that will happen. > > > > > I have time today, I will take a care to submit upstream bugs about > > > > > porting and will try to send patches with bugs. > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I see that you built python-pygit2 just now. > > > > > > > > >> * gitg > > > I forgot gitg. Rebuilding now. > > So, upstream started working on updating the api, but it doesn't > > build yet. But it looks like it might be done fairly quickly. > > > > > > > >> * gnome-builder > > > > > >> * kate-plugins > > > > > >> * kf5-ktexteditor > > > > > >> * python-pygit2 > > > > > >> * python3-pygit2 > > > > > >> * rubygem-rugged > > > > > >> * gedit-plugin-git > > > Those are all done now. > > > > > > > > >> * subsurface > > > TBD. > > > > > > > > > Above was all for rawhide. For F23, if it turns out that it is not > > > > > > possible to rebuild everything quickly, the change should be > > reverted > > > > > > imho. > > > OK. It seems that fortunately this will not be necessary. > > > I'll start doing the rebuilds later today. > > So, we're still missing subsurface and gitg. Let's wait. > > > > Zbyszek > > -- > > devel mailing list > > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > > -- > > -Igor Gnatenko > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
