Re: gross DNF bandwidth inefficiency if filesystem space limited

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Am 31.07.2015 um 05:47 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 02:56:48AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Radek Holy wrote:
Known, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220074. Should be
fixed in dnf-1.0.2.

I still don't understand why we don't just enable keepcache by default. Even
after a successful update/install, deleting the cached packages is a major
data loss because it prevents downgrading to them later, after a broken new
update comes out (which also removes the previous update from the mirrors).

Most people don't downgrade or do it very rarely? It can be
said that downgrading is an advanced operation, and you can
set keepcache=1 if you need it

and then there are they cases where deps are solved but files conflicts, the transaction check fails like recently with two broken polkit updates

have fun typing "dnf --skip-broken upgrade" (yes i know NF lacks --skip-broken ATM) and download the other packages again for *zero reason*

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux