walters@xxxxxxxxxx (Colin Walters) writes: >> > Yes; but you still have the rpm revision number. I am arguing for its >> > removal entirely. >> >> How will you workaround non-numeric versions which would break rpmvercmp() >> without manual revisions? > > Perhaps the spec file could provide a little python function to fix > upstream versions. How do you fix '2.6.9-rc1'? > Or you have an override file. What is that? > Or (preferably) you get upstream to name their versions sanely. Hahaha... that's a good one... I will ask Linus to use sane version numbers. ;) Enrico
