On Sat, 2004-12-18 at 00:40 +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote: > walters@xxxxxxxxxx (Colin Walters) writes: > > > Yes; but you still have the rpm revision number. I am arguing for its > > removal entirely. > > How will you workaround non-numeric versions which would break rpmvercmp() > without manual revisions? Perhaps the spec file could provide a little python function to fix upstream versions. Or you have an override file. Or (preferably) you get upstream to name their versions sanely.
