walters@xxxxxxxxxx (Colin Walters) writes: > Yes; but you still have the rpm revision number. I am arguing for its > removal entirely. How will you workaround non-numeric versions which would break rpmvercmp() without manual revisions? Enrico
walters@xxxxxxxxxx (Colin Walters) writes: > Yes; but you still have the rpm revision number. I am arguing for its > removal entirely. How will you workaround non-numeric versions which would break rpmvercmp() without manual revisions? Enrico