Re: Qt 5 private headers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rex Dieter wrote:

> Ruslan Nigmatullin wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 12.06.2015, 16:32, "Rex Dieter" <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>> Ruslan Nigmatullin wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Are you willing to help work on it? :)
>>>>
>>>> Sure, I may have a look. How can I start?
>>>
>>> Start by identifying precisely what should be declared as private.
>>> Offhand I see:
>>> /usr/include/qt5/*/private/
>>> /usr/lib(64)/qt5/mkspecs/modules/qt_lib*_private.pri
>>>
>>> anything more than that?
>> 
>> Sorry for misunderstanding, my question is about more final step, what
>> should I do once I get modified *.spec file and check it by rpmbuild?
>> Should I send it to one of current Qt5 maintainers?
> 
> Let's take baby steps, starting with the first.  identifying the content
> that should be declared as private.
> 
> fyi, I'm one of the Qt5 maintainers, so you're talking to the right people
> already.

A colleague pointed out the debian is already doing -private splits too, for 
example,

https://packages.debian.org/sid/i386/qtbase5-private-dev/filelist

which is close to what I expected (minus the 
mkspecs/modules/qt_lib*_private.pri though)

-- Rex

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux