Hi,
I've just noticed that there are not separate packages for private headers of Qt 5 in Fedora but there is one for Qt 4. Also I've checked specs of some packages like qt5-qtdeclarative which uses private headers during the compilation and their rpms depends on qt5-qtbase >= ${qt5_version} instead of qt5-qtbase == ${qt5_version} which may be source of various errors (because Qt doesn't guarantee API/ABI compatibility for private headers).
Is it made on purpose and how does Fedora guarantee that nothing breaks in case of Qt's minor/patch updates?
--
Ruslan Nigmatullin
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
