11.06.2015, 10:01, "Rex Dieter" <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Ruslan Nigmatullin wrote:
>
>> I've just noticed that there are not separate packages for private headers
>> of Qt 5 in Fedora but there is one for Qt 4.
>
> The Qt4 one was just a hack (for qt-creator).
The issue is that right now private headers are installed as part of qt5-qtbase-devel package, and I doubt that Qt4's libqt4-devel-private is a bug after that :)
>> Also I've checked specs of
>> some packages like qt5-qtdeclarative which uses private headers during the
>> compilation and their rpms depends on qt5-qtbase >= ${qt5_version} instead
>> of qt5-qtbase == ${qt5_version} which may be source of various errors
>> (because Qt doesn't guarantee API/ABI compatibility for private headers).
>>
>> Is it made on purpose and how does Fedora guarantee that nothing breaks in
>> case of Qt's minor/patch updates?
>
> There is no guarantee (for private header usage), no one has done the work
> yet to implement that in the packaging yet.
>
> Are you willing to help work on it? :)
Sure, I may have a look. How can I start? Is there any way to test if I've broken anything in any way except trying to rebuild all Fedora's packages (Qt5 and all dependencies like KDE) at my laptop?
> -- Rex
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
--
Ruslan Nigmatullin
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
