Re: svn or arch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Colin Walters wrote:

I was more concerned about breaking binary
compatibility. srpms would still be relevant to people
who dont have a build setup similar to redhat right?

No; you should be able to build packages from the Fedora public CVS without access to the Fedora build system. I say "should" in that I don't know if it works now, but I think it's a bug if it doesn't.

I am certainly mindful of this popular request and I believe it is something we should attempt to have.


Cristian
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cristian Gafton     --     gafton@xxxxxxxxxx      --     Red Hat, Inc.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Linux is a leprosy; and is having a deleterious effect on the U.S. IT
industry because it is steadily depreciating the value of the software
industry sector."
    -- Kenneth Brown, President, Alexis de Tocqueville Institution


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux