Hi > One thing that should be clear is that by using a > revision control > system for RPM packaging, we've already conceptually > broken > compatibility because the SRPM is no longer the > preferred form of > modification, to use the GPL terminology. I was more concerned about breaking binary compatibility. srpms would still be relevant to people who dont have a build setup similar to redhat right? ===== Regards Rahul Sundaram __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Dress up your holiday email, Hollywood style. Learn more. http://celebrity.mail.yahoo.com
