On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 10:45:20AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Ideally it would not only install those packages, but configure them to > a default to privacy setup. Additionally making some other changes from > default desktop settings to do that as well. This is something that > could be done in the spin %post or the like (all the other spins setup > various config there), or perhaps in a seperate package like a > 'netizen-privacy' that makes those changes. But, but ... > So, you not only include say tor, but you setup the browser to use it > by default, etc. ... then there is the issue of choice. I am paranoid, but I also have strong opinions on how my desktop should look and behave. Will we be offering different variants of the Netizen spin, then? Or have we finally given up on this choice thing? ;) You could take that as a general criticism of most of the non-DE spins out there. I would be happier if someone did the hard work of making things more secure, in the products and spins that we already have. I don't think our users should have to choose between a more secure and a less secure Fedora. eg., just because someone wants to use Tor, doesn't mean that she should have to install a different flavour of Fedora. She should be able to configure it in any of the flavours or products that she is already using. Other than that, I have found it hard to comprehend the text on the Wiki. It spends a lot of time talking about a paper from 1943 and physiological needs. I don't understand why "citizens" are considered alternative users of Fedora. Cheers, Debarshi
Attachment:
pgpvZcXbvfSYN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
