On Wed, 3 Jun 2015 14:29:25 -0400 Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 02:21:42PM -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > So, to be explicit: > > <FESCo hat on> > > The spin description, and spin contents, need to be put in line, so > > that users installing the spin will get what they will expect to get > > by reading the description; either by changing the description to > > more precisely match the limited amount of what the spin currently > > does, or by changing the scope to match the fairly ambitious > > description. > > </FESCo hat on> > > > And... > > <hat="Fedora Council"> > > I don't want to use a fairly strong, evocative name like "Fedora > Netizen" for something which actually has much less-ambitious contents > and scope — no matter the description (which is inevitably seen > later). So, I would currently be -1 to a trademark request. > > </hat> I'd like to add here that I personally like the idea around this spin, but I would want it to live up to that idea. Just providing a collection of privacy packages installed by default is great, but it's not going to lead to a good experience or meet users expectations. Ideally it would not only install those packages, but configure them to a default to privacy setup. Additionally making some other changes from default desktop settings to do that as well. This is something that could be done in the spin %post or the like (all the other spins setup various config there), or perhaps in a seperate package like a 'netizen-privacy' that makes those changes. So, you not only include say tor, but you setup the browser to use it by default, etc. kevin
Attachment:
pgp8Klj9vMc06.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
