> And generally I agree with the concern raised on the spins list > (https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/spins/2015-May/004222.html and > following) that the spin description can, at least by a quick read without > reading the actual kickstart, likely to be misunderstood to deliver more > than it actually does. For example, just including a tor package by no means > guarantees privacy (e.g. it does nothing about all the ways Fedora leaks > information about being Fedora). So, to be explicit: <FESCo hat on> The spin description, and spin contents, need to be put in line, so that users installing the spin will get what they will expect to get by reading the description; either by changing the description to more precisely match the limited amount of what the spin currently does, or by changing the scope to match the fairly ambitious description. </FESCo hat on> Also, without wielding the FESCo hat, at least to me that the discussion of philosophy and hierarchies is obscuring rather than clarifying the purpose and scale of the project. Mirek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
