On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 05:34:30 +0100 (CET), Dag Wieers <dag@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I would be less than keen to remove things that I may have to add later. > > But if you volunteer for that, I have no problem with it :) Again, a large > > part does not require extra macros or only have extra macros to provide > > 'features' to rebuilders. > > Was that an answer to my question? I was hoping you could give me a > simple yes or no. It was an answer to your question, a simple yes or no would be ignoring some important matters. I'm not requiring an immediate change to anything, I just need to know what the direction is and if it fits my longterm goals, goals that could easily be part of Fedora Extras. I could say 'Yes' for those packages that don't have macros and require no change. I could say 'No' because for the packages that do use macros as I'm not interested to spend the extra time (I do not have). Besides I can't give you a definitive fiat unless the project is outlined more. Again, as I said on the Fedora ml, I wouldn't be spending my time here (and before with fedora.us) if I wasn't willing to work with Fedora Extras and Red Hat or did not see the potential. To be honest, he fact that you keep implying I have other intentions gives a sense of hostility. > Or to ask a more general question, will you be waiting until you can > import your entire collection in one push? Of course not. You haven't read my previous mail very well :) -- dag wieers, dag@xxxxxxxxxx, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
