Mike Hearn wrote: > On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 14:48:10 -0500, Neal D. Becker wrote: >> You might want to look at darcs. This one looks the most promising, in >> it's >> design. Only disadvantage, it's written in Haskell. > > Darcs also has scalability issues as admitted to by the author. So I guess > it would fail for the same reasons subversion and arch did. > > thanks -mike > Yes, that's why I said the _design_ looks promising. The implementation still is immature.
