Re: svn or arch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 14:48:10 -0500, Neal D. Becker wrote:
> You might want to look at darcs.  This one looks the most promising, in it's
> design.  Only disadvantage, it's written in Haskell.

Darcs also has scalability issues as admitted to by the author. So I guess
it would fail for the same reasons subversion and arch did. 

thanks -mike


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux