seth vidal wrote: > On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 10:21 -0800, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> Hi >> >> > Yes - Cristian Gafton did months of extensive >> > testing to see if either >> > could stand up to the load of internal and external >> > checkins on the >> > scale red hat does with distributions. >> > >> > He found that cvs was the only one to stand up to >> > the load. >> >> Ok thanks for the quick reply. are the results >> available anywhere. It would be nice to let the >> svn/arch developers know about this. I am pretty sure >> they would be interested > > You can ask - but i'm not sure they are. > > I know of them anecdotally - However, from what I know of Gafton he had > good reason for saying what he said. > > -sv > > You might want to look at darcs. This one looks the most promising, in it's design. Only disadvantage, it's written in Haskell.
