On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 3:09 AM, Jaroslav Skarvada <jskarvad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> On 01.04.2015 10:29, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: >> >>> pm-hibernate is obsolete as others already mentioned. >> >> >> >> Do the pm-utils maintainers/upstream know this? >> >> >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > I am pm-utils maintainer. I own some other "legacy" packages and >> > I am retiring them only if there are good reasons for it >> > (e.g. unfixed security bugs, breakage, etc.), because there may >> > be still users using such packages / depending on their functionality. >> > >> > Regarding pm-utils, most of the functionality is currently handled >> > by systemd. If there is anybody still using it, I think it shouldn't be >> > hard to migrate. Also I think this package may be quite confusing >> > for newcomers. Upstream said it's dead, so there are probably >> > good reasons to retire. But currently there are the following >> > packages in rawhide depending on pm-utils: >> > >> > cdm >> > kdebase3 >> >> >> Same as with the 'cdm'. >> >> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/kdebase3.git/commit/?id=2221c4 >> + >> kdebase3.spec >> Patch26: kdebase-3.5.5-suspend.patch >> %define _with_suspend 1 >> %{?_with_suspend:%patch26 -p1 -b .suspend} >> >> --- >> kdebase-3.5.5-suspend.patch | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/kdebase-3.5.5-suspend.patch b/kdebase-3.5.5-suspend.patch >> index 0462543..e1a5d0a 100644 >> --- a/kdebase-3.5.5-suspend.patch >> +++ b/kdebase-3.5.5-suspend.patch >> @@ -62,8 +62,8 @@ >> +void KSMShutdownDlg::slotSuspend() >> +{ >> + switch ( suspendType ) { >> -+ case SUSPEND_TYPE_HIBERNATE: system("/usr/bin/pm-hibernate"); break; >> -+ case SUSPEND_TYPE_STANDBY: system("/usr/bin/pm-suspend"); break; >> ++ case SUSPEND_TYPE_HIBERNATE: system("/usr/bin/systemctl hibernate"); >> break; >> ++ case SUSPEND_TYPE_STANDBY: system("/usr/bin/systemctl suspend"); >> break; >> + } >> + reject(); >> +} >> >> ... >> >> > I will drop pm-utils when resolved >> > >> > regards >> > >> > Jaroslav >> > >> >> And that's it. >> - cdm DONE >> - kdebase3 DONE >> - wicd DONE >> - pm-utils DONE >> >> >> > > Thanks, > > retired in master Is that good enough? Should systemd obsolete it, too? I thought the whole point of this thread was that pm-utils was actively dangerous now, so shouldn't we actively remove it from users' systems? --Andy -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct