On Mon, 30.03.15 08:57, Till Maas (opensource@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > Hi, > > it seems to be that me have a major problem of core package maintainers > coordinating features in Fedora. > > See for example: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174945 > > There the problem is, that dracut runs a fsck check before deciding > whether to resume. This can result in a big file system corruption, > since the kernel had a different idea of the file system state after > resuming from hibernation that there really is. The problem has several > core players that do not seem to communicate: > > - dracut which uses systemd and showed this problem in F21 (I did not > notice it in F20) > - systemd: > - might have changed things in F21 to break resuming > - Does only parse the kernel command line, does not parse the > options that dracut gathers from the system during initramfs > generation > - provides hibernation support via "systemctl hibernate", which is > also what pm-hibernate does (why do we have two tools for the same > core task?) > - anaconda, which does not add a resume= kernel command line option when > installing a system > > Therefore please coordinate with others if you maintain a key component > for a core distribution feature and look for other items that need to be > adjusted. systemd 217 introduced support for doing the hibernation resume logic in the initrd on its own without any external support, see the man page systemd-hibernate-resume(8). This does not require any explicit support in Dracut. pm-hibernate is obsolete as others already mentioned. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
