Re: hibernation support - lack of distro-wide coordination between systemd, dracut, anaconda, pm-utils and maybe more?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 07:40:58PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:

> systemd 217 introduced support for doing the hibernation resume logic
> in the initrd on its own without any external support, see the man
> page systemd-hibernate-resume(8). This does not require any explicit
> support in Dracut.

What does this tell us? Fedora 21 uses systemd 216 according to the RPM
version. Does this already include all changes from 217? Why was a patch
for dracut necessary to get it work better? Is it supposed to run
without a resume= kernel parameter? If it needs one, then changes are
needed, because dracut stores the resume information in the initramfs
itself instead of using the kernel command line.

> pm-hibernate is obsolete as others already mentioned.

Do the pm-utils maintainers/upstream know this?

Regards
Till
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux