Orion Poplawski <orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Do we know if the actual ABI is incompatible, rather than library >> names/contents? If not, a compatibility libmpich might be useful, >> partly to avoid breaking existing binaries and partly because I suspect >> some things will look for a library of that name, at least when >> building. > > Hard to say, but it's a fairly moot point as the soname has changed. I don't understand. That would be the reason for making compatibility shims, assuming the soname is consistent with the library name. Anyhow, I don't have strong feelings about what it might forestall, especially as I don't run Fedora, but got bitten by RHEL. > Personally I think it's worth just biting the bullet and pushing 3.1.4 to F22 > now and doing the rebuilds. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
