Sandro Mani <manisandro@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> openmpi seems to be using >> >> /usr/lib64/openmpi/bin/ >> /usr/lib64/openmpi/lib/ >> >> so perhaps the "mpich" option is better than a generic "mpi"? >> > Yes, and this is the way it was before. I'd say this is just an > oversight in mpich-modules.patch [1], @MPILIBNAME@ changed for the > libmpich.so -> libmpi.so rename, and it ended up having this side > effect. Yes, it's surely a bug. It will likely break rebuilds, so it's probably worth holding off on them. (I made a BZ report earlier after puzzling over why the package rebuild I was asked for failed.) Do we know if the actual ABI is incompatible, rather than library names/contents? If not, a compatibility libmpich might be useful, partly to avoid breaking existing binaries and partly because I suspect some things will look for a library of that name, at least when building. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
