2015-03-15 18:32 GMT-03:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 04:16:50PM -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: >> Hi, >> >> In case you would like to see it faster in Fedora :) >> >> 0ad-0.18 needs mozjs31, so I need this package reviewed >> and approved: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202131 >> >> For rawhide I also need gloox rebuilt for the new >> c++ string and list abi: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202059 >> >> I pushed commits for 0ad and 0ad-data only for rawhide, >> but requiring the new mozjs31 package, and gloox rebuilt, >> "it works for me". > You shouldn't treat rawhide as a dumping ground for packages > which cannot work. Use a copr or a scratch build. It was not a good idea to push 0ad with a build requires that is not yet available (mozjs31), but otherwise, 0ad-0.17 would also fail to build until gloox is rebuilt. I can remake a previous experimental patch if mozjs31 delays too much, to have a conditional on building with bundled mozjs31, but that would be non default, as would need fesco approval for the bundling. > Zbyszek > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
