Am 26.02.2015 um 15:05 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 02/26/2015 01:29 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 05:13:53PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:Sure I have a stake in systemd, but certainly none in fedora-release.rpm. But even for systemd, there are a number of peopleSorry for the somewhat slow reply, but I've been thinking about all of this.... I guess, primarily, what I'd really hope for is for _all_ Fedora package maintainers to feel like they have a stake in fedora-release.rpm, at least in a symbolic and general sense. As Fedora contributors, we should not just think about individual ownership of the packages we are primarily responsible for, but also how it all fits together.You will need to change the ownership model of packages in the distribution if you want to change that and related expectations regarding individual ownership. Until you do you should expect others to expect relevant maintainer(s) be responsible for the component they maintain
really? why? how do you come to that weird conclusion?surely, one can say "not my package, not my problem" but that's ignorant and needs no guidelines and policies - sanity should be enough
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
