Re: i686 kernel bug priority plan

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 5:43 AM, Jared K. Smith
<jsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 5:40 AM, drago01 <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> i686 has nothing to do with ARM. So when someone says "i686" he/she
>> means "32bit x86".
>
>
>
> Well yes -- that's what *I* take it to mean -- I just wanted to make sure that's what everyone else took it to mean as well.  I just wanted to make sure that the conversation really was around 32-bit x86 and not 32-bit in general.

i686 means i686, not all of 32-bit.  I even gave the ARM and other
architecture SIGs kudos and thank yous as examples of how I'd like to
see i686 support grow earlier in the thread...

josh
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux