Re: i686 kernel bug priority plan

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Jared K. Smith
<jsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> we should strongly consider demoting i686 to secondary architecture
>> for installation media at the Fedora 23 branch point (about six months
>> from now).
>
>
> Is this intended only for 32-bit kernels on x86-based processors, or for
> other 32-bit platforms such as ARM as well?  It'd be a shame to see arm7hl
> support demoted to secondary arch, especially when there's a strong group of
> contributors actively working on issues, and Aarch64 hardware is still
> reasonably hard to obtain.

i686 has nothing to do with ARM. So when someone says "i686" he/she
means "32bit x86".
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux