On 02/26/2015 09:20 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/26/2015 08:42 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
Also, my proposal of introducing "java" metapackage (see my other post
in this thread), which would always require the latest JDK, solves this
problem in a different way, without modifying ordinary Java packages
at all.
May you be more exact with the metapackage? Before I come up with
legacy, I hoped to solve the issues via some metapackage. At the end I
gave up, because the touch of user was always necessary.
I described it in much detail in other posts in this thread
(for example message-ID 54ECA102.1070506@xxxxxxxxxx)
Yah. Sorry. I walked across it later then replied this.
However - I'm not convinced that metapackage will work as expected. If nothing else it will need
some changes in current infrastructure which I wonted to avoid.
Thanx for that!
J.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
