On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I sound a bit accusatory there. Wasn't meant that way :-) I don'tOn Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:39:16AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 08:04:53AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
> > > I rebuilt libcutl the other day and then noticed that later boost was
> > > rebuilt. libcutl depends on boost, so is it a problem that it was rebuilt
> > > before boost was?
> >
> > Yes. Jakub Jelinek wrote on this list:
> >
> > <quote>
> > Also, a releng mass rebuild, which I believe is a random package order,
> > would very likely not help very much, due to the ABI changes one needs to
> > rebuild the packages in topological order, non-C++ packages or C++
> > packages
> > that nothing C++ depends on of course can be left for the mass rebuild,
> > but
> > ideally the rest should be rebuilt manually before the mass rebuild.
> > </quote>
> >
>
> I had read through the original "results of a test mass rebuild" and didn't
> notice anything like that. Sorry for the oversight on my part and thanks
> for the info.
read even a tenth of all the email lists I'm subscribed to either ..
No worries. I was very appreciative of the help and the quick response.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
