On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:39:16AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 08:04:53AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote: > > > I rebuilt libcutl the other day and then noticed that later boost was > > > rebuilt. libcutl depends on boost, so is it a problem that it was rebuilt > > > before boost was? > > > > Yes. Jakub Jelinek wrote on this list: > > > > <quote> > > Also, a releng mass rebuild, which I believe is a random package order, > > would very likely not help very much, due to the ABI changes one needs to > > rebuild the packages in topological order, non-C++ packages or C++ > > packages > > that nothing C++ depends on of course can be left for the mass rebuild, > > but > > ideally the rest should be rebuilt manually before the mass rebuild. > > </quote> > > > > I had read through the original "results of a test mass rebuild" and didn't > notice anything like that. Sorry for the oversight on my part and thanks > for the info. I sound a bit accusatory there. Wasn't meant that way :-) I don't read even a tenth of all the email lists I'm subscribed to either .. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
