Re: Does order matter for the rebuilds for the gcc 5.0 C++ ABI change?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 08:04:53AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
> I rebuilt libcutl the other day and then noticed that later boost was
> rebuilt. libcutl depends on boost, so is it a problem that it was rebuilt
> before boost was?

Yes.  Jakub Jelinek wrote on this list:

<quote>
  Also, a releng mass rebuild, which I believe is a random package order,
  would very likely not help very much, due to the ABI changes one needs to
  rebuild the packages in topological order, non-C++ packages or C++ packages
  that nothing C++ depends on of course can be left for the mass rebuild, but
  ideally the rest should be rebuilt manually before the mass rebuild.
</quote>

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and
build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux