Re: [Proposal] Ring-based Packaging Policies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/17/2015 05:59 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 05:39:48PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Why not to create a new repository with reduced policy as
Stephen proposed with the one-way dependency rule (between current
Fedora and the new easy-for-beginners repository)?
Because this would establish a 2-class society, with double
standards standards and so on.

If the distinction were drawn based on _who_ rather than _what and
why_, it would. (And that was fundamentally the problem with the old
Core vs. Extras.) But no one is proposing a _society_-based distinction
— instead, a _technical_ one.

I know and understand this, but I expect the outcome to be the same:

Ring 0 == Red Hat
Ring 1 == The Red Hat business/RHEL-irrelevant parts

In other words, on the techicall level I do not see any difference to CentOS+RHEL and to Core+Extras

On the political and social level, .... it raises questions going far beyond these consideration


Ralf



--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux