On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:13:23 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 02/17/2015 05:59 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 05:39:48PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >>> Why not to create a new repository with reduced policy as > >>> Stephen proposed with the one-way dependency rule (between current > >>> Fedora and the new easy-for-beginners repository)? > >> Because this would establish a 2-class society, with double > >> standards standards and so on. > > > > If the distinction were drawn based on _who_ rather than _what and > > why_, it would. (And that was fundamentally the problem with the old > > Core vs. Extras.) But no one is proposing a _society_-based distinction > > — instead, a _technical_ one. > > I know and understand this, but I expect the outcome to be the same: > > Ring 0 == Red Hat > Ring 1 == The Red Hat business/RHEL-irrelevant parts > > In other words, on the techicall level I do not see any difference to > CentOS+RHEL and to Core+Extras > > On the political and social level, .... it raises questions going far > beyond these consideration I wonder why it has become silent in this thread already? Is there another place where those "ideas" get discussed? | https://twitter.com/Worldcleaver/status/565957125600321538 | | Stephen Gallagher @Worldcleaver | | Wherein I kick the hornets' nest again: | https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-February/207657.html | … (Proposal to relax Fedora packaging requirements in some cases) -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
