>
> Also RH and other distros history repeatedly has told the lesson
> such will not fly and are doomed to fail.
It seems to have been working just fine in RPMFusion, where the free
and nonfree repositories have different standards for inclusion, and
where packages in nonfree can depend on packages in free, but not the
other way.
The only difference in both repositories is the license of the software. The package guidelines are exactly the same as Fedora's (with the exception of kernel modules) in both repos.
At another scale, it seems to not be working too badly already for
Fedora+RPMFusion, where Fedora and RPMFusion have different standards
for inclusion, and where packages in RPMFusion can depend on packages
in Fedora, but not the other way.
The standard for inclusion in rpmfusion is not being elegible to be in Fedora. Again, the reasons are purelly legal (with the exception of kernel modules). Again, there is no difference in the guidelines (bundled libraries must be unblundled, etc)
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
