On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:54:24AM +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > Le mardi 17 février 2015 à 17:39 +0100, Ralf Corsepius a écrit : > > On 02/17/2015 05:18 PM, Petr Pisar wrote: > > > > > Why not to create a new repository with reduced policy as > > > Stephen proposed with the one-way dependency rule (between current > > > Fedora and the new easy-for-beginners repository)? > > > > Because this would establish a 2-class society, with double > > standards standards and so on. > > > > Also RH and other distros history repeatedly has told the lesson > > such will not fly and are doomed to fail. > > It seems to have been working just fine in RPMFusion, where the free > and nonfree repositories have different standards for inclusion, and > where packages in nonfree can depend on packages in free, but not the > other way. The comparison isn't really valid, the difference between the two repos is not technical but more based on the license/re-distribution rights. While, what has been mentioned before would be two repos having the same redistribution policy but two different technical requirements. Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
