On 29 January 2015 at 09:50, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
-- On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 09:03:05PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> Clarified the naming guidelines to indicate how language bindings are
> named: lua-randomdb instead of randomdb-lua:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28General.29
Good to have this clarified. However java packages don't appear to
follow this convention. eg:
antlr3-java-1:3.5.2-2.fc21.noarch
plplot-java-0:5.10.0-11.fc21.i686
R-java-0:3.1.2-1.fc21.x86_64
tzdata-java-2014j-1.fc21.noarch
Does this mean we need to rename all Java subpackages?
All language binding sub-packages are named this way, no? (subversion-perl, plplot-ada, xen-ocaml, etc)
But doesn't this guideline refer to naming the base package, not sub-packages? Does it need clarifying further?
But doesn't this guideline refer to naming the base package, not sub-packages? Does it need clarifying further?
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
