Re: [Guielines Change] Changes to the packaging guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "RS" == Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

RS> Is this retroactive on all supported versions of Fedora?

Packaging guideline changes are pretty much never retroactive; we don't
really have an enforcement body.

RS> 20+?

Well, <20 isn't exactly important.

RS> What about EPEL 5, 6, 7?

Pretty sure 7 is OK, but in any case, EPEL has its own guidelines.
Still, here's some magic:
  %{!?_licensedir:%global license %%doc}
Now everything supports %license.  I so wish there was an
epel-rpm-config package that could hold this kind of thing.

RS> Should some basic steps be added there? Or perhaps a link to another
RS> wiki page?

Feel free to make a more concrete suggestion and I'll be happy to make
the change.

 - J<
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux