Re: [Guielines Change] Changes to the packaging guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
%license must be used in place of %doc to designate any file containing
the license information for a package. See
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Documentation and
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines

Is this retroactive on all supported versions of Fedora? 20+? What about EPEL 5, 6, 7?

 
Added information on dealing with unversioned shared libraries:
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Downstream_.so_name_versioning

It's neat to see reference to abi-compliance-checker (hint, I maintain it!) but the link just points to the package. While it's not necessarily difficult to use, I wouldn't quite call it intuitive either.

Should some basic steps be added there? Or perhaps a link to another wiki page?

Thanks,
Richard
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux