Re: F22 System Wide Change: Systemd Package Split

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
<zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 04:41:53AM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> I agree on the systemd-filesystem side of things, the binaries sounds
>> like it would be better described as systemd-utils with a provides for
>> -units.

> This could be a good idea, but I think that having an additional
> name would cause more confusion. The name is arbitrary anyway.

Sure, put all the interesting tools in a -utils rpm. Oh, wait, we
already have that, it is called systemd.rpm. :)

I really do not want to see this broken package-split being
implemented. The core systemd is not supposed to be separated into
different packages. Things have complex inter-dependencies, they
change all the time and they move around. Splitting them will just
create a mess, for no apparent reason than optimizing some misguided
space-saving efforts.

We really have more important problems to solve than making the
already far to complex package management even worse, and without any
obvious benefit.

Please just drop the entire proposal.

Thanks,
Kay
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux