On Wed, 21.01.15 12:21, Jaroslav Reznik (jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > Systemd contains many binaries and depends on a fairly large number of > libraries. Packages which carry systemd units currently have to depend on > systemd (through %post, %preun, %postun macros used to install and uninstall > systemd units), which grows the dependency tree and increases the size of > minimal installs. > > With this proposal systemd-units subpackages will be split out again: > systemd-units Really not a fan of this, but you are proposing here to reintroduce a "-units" package again, and it will container directories and binaries, but no actual units? Did I get that right? Like Kay I think a "systemd-filesystem.rpm" that owns the dirs would be a better idea... In particular as the systemctl invocations are all suffixed with "|| : > /dev/null 2> /dev/null" (at least the ones done via our macros), and hence should become NOPs if systemd itself is missing... Not enthusiastic, Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
