On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 04:41:53AM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > I agree on the systemd-filesystem side of things, the binaries sounds > like it would be better described as systemd-utils with a provides for > -units. This could be a good idea, but I think that having an additional name would cause more confusion. The name is arbitrary anyway. > I don't believe you necessarily need systemd in some container > situations so possibly that's what's being looked at. Yes, also that. Zbyszek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
