On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 7:16 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 12:10 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> > I'd like to propose an amendment to allow >> > bringing packages even if no reviewers are available (the typical case). >> > >> > Step 6: ... If the proposed package is not reviewed for 2 months, the >> > package must be reviewed by the submitter, and a git module with the >> > master branch will be approved. >> The self review doesn't make sense, since I expect you did the package >> to your best knowledge already and you really want second pair of eyes >> to find any issues which slipped through your hands. >> At least myself, I always looking for reviewer who cares to find every >> issues I missed, challenge my knowledge and I'd be quite unhappy to >> discover later that something slipped through review unnoticed. > > That's wishful thinking. I proposed that rule in order to make apparent > the fact that there are not enough reviewers and new packages are > blocked in the queue. Ignoring the fact isn't going to make it go away. I've often thought having a "staging" repository for packages in this state would be nice. They could be worked on there, and then promoted to the full repo when they passed review. josh -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
