Re: amending the new package process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 21.1.2015 v 11:49 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos napsal(a):
> I'd like to propose an amendment to allow
> bringing packages even if no reviewers are available (the typical case).
>
> Step 6: ... If the proposed package is not reviewed for 2 months, the
> package must be reviewed by the submitter, and a git module with the
> master branch will be approved.

The self review doesn't make sense, since I expect you did the package
to your best knowledge already and you really want second pair of eyes
to find any issues which slipped through your hands.

At least myself, I always looking for reviewer who cares to find every
issues I missed, challenge my knowledge and I'd be quite unhappy to
discover later that something slipped through review unnoticed.

And there is nothing wrong with review swaps. You help others, they help
you.


Vít

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux