On 01/14/2015 03:10 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 01/12/2015 06:08 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dear Fedora developers,
I'd like to collect some feedback about the $SUBJECT, i.e. making
minimal build root really minimal, explicitly specifying build
dependencies, etc.
Would it be technically feasible to have a different buildroot for arch
and noarch packages?
What would this be useful for?
noarch-packages have dependencies on arch'ed packages (thus may trigger
bugs inside of these packages), may generated arched files (because of
packaging bugs) etc. pp.
I.e. a buildsys-build-noarch group?
IMO, this is technically equivalent to building on one specific
architecture, with the same pros and cons.
I.e. IMO all this would add is complexity.
Ralf
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
