On 01/15/2015 04:20 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 01/14/2015 03:10 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> On 01/12/2015 06:08 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >>> Dear Fedora developers, >>> >>> I'd like to collect some feedback about the $SUBJECT, i.e. making >>> minimal build root really minimal, explicitly specifying build >>> dependencies, etc. >>> >> >> Would it be technically feasible to have a different buildroot for arch >> and noarch packages? > What would this be useful for? The thought would be that (almost all) noarch packages don't need gcc, so the noarch buildroot could exclude gcc without impacting existing packages. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion@xxxxxxxx Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
