Re: Why isn't F2FS support in the Kernel?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 22.12.2014 um 20:57 schrieb Gerald B. Cox:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:

    No they do not have all the information needed. What they know is
    that some other distribution ships it and that it works in a device
    using a custom kernel. How does it work on a normal drive, how does
    it not work, how are the tools functioning with the toolset, what
    extra patchsets need to be found and gotten to make sure what is in
    the kernel actually works as well as it does in say the Nexus 9.

Oy Vey!  This isn't a space shuttle launch.  If no one else was using
this, that would be another thing.  You're also making up rules that
weren't applied to other products which are included in Fedora; and
asking for Q/A theater to obfuscate.   You can try to spin it another
way, but most people aren't buying it

*wow* and i am accused to be abusive repeatly?

what about step back and wait until it is enabled...
F2FS is really not mission critical for a Workstation or Server

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux