On 18 December 2014 at 09:46, Bastien Nocera <bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > To be honest, the "slowly evolving" AppData requirements/changes have > also grated me the wrong way. Okay, so that's probably something we need to do something about. Would more frequent blogging help or hinder this? > I get confused by the upstream vs. Fedora requirements, They are the same thing, no? > I get confused by the F21 vs. F22 requirements. So, at the moment the only way that F22 and F21 differ is that F22 requires a minimum icon size of 48px, and f21 requires 32px. Most actively maintained packages (especially the kind of ones you maintain) easily meet this requirement. Would a generated HTML page of: pkgname,fasname,application-id,green/red for F21, green/red for F22? be a useful thing to do? > I get annoyed that I can't easily test changes and see what it will look like Doesn't dumping the updated AppData file in /usr/share/appdata work? Richard -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
