Re: AppData Screenshot Requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




----- Original Message -----
> On 13 December 2014 at 01:05, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I think you should step back and consider this in context.
> > *Everything* we do in Fedora, and more generally speaking in open
> > source, is a work in progress.
> 
> 100% agree, I couldn't have said this better myself. The only way for
> a standard to remain relevant and useful is to allow it to slowly
> evolve.

To be honest, the "slowly evolving" AppData requirements/changes have
also grated me the wrong way. I get confused by the upstream vs. Fedora
requirements, I get confused by the F21 vs. F22 requirements. I get annoyed
that I can't easily test changes and see what it will look like (although
the tools got somewhat better recently).

This would explain why the AppData for my packages haven't been up-to-scratch,
I'm just waiting for the updated requirements a couple of weeks from now.

Cheers
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux