Re: i486 base architecture

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 11:10:04PM -0500, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> Prolly the strongest mechanism is to attach a run-time probe dependency to
> the "cpu(...)" name space and parse /proc/cpuinfo for the relevant info.
> That mostly works, but will have problems in chroot's w/o /proc mounted,
> and will be kinda weird if/when, say, the mobo or disk is moved amongst
> machines, to mention just 2 possible problems off the top of my head.
> 
> I suspect those deficiencies can be lived with, and are no worse than 
> existing arch based tests.
Would there be any compilications if the thing was generalized and
you could do Requires-Return-Code: /usr/lib/rpm/check-x86-cpu-flags cmov
(or whatever the syntax would be, basic idea is that there's some
external thing that exits with 0 or 1). 

In any case, such a thing should be easy to override, even when
using a frontend like yum.

-- 
Pekka Pietikainen


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux