On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 12:07 -0500, Jeff Johnson wrote: > OK, to summarize: > > a) There's a whole lot of pain and not much gain messing with > package file names (and file paths and scripts and ... ) > b) The dependency > Requires: cpu(cmov) > (or equivalent token) might (*will* imho) be useful identifying > packages that actually use, say, cmov. > (Note: there's more than cmov that needs marking, generalizing > the cpu(...) name space is quite straightforward.) > c) Users want a clear call on what package file name to install, as > some *.i386.rpm will not run on arch i386, very confusing. > d) linuxthreads needs to die! die! die! (but that's just me ;-) > > Name your poison (if any) please. What's going to Provide: cpu(cmov)? -- Nicholas Miell <nmiell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
