Re: i486 base architecture

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Arjan van de Ven wrote:

So actually that could be a good reason why we should switch over to
i486 as base arch?



for the glibc package... sure ;)

for all other packages... none will use the new instructions afaics



Absolutely agreed, more pain that gain for s/i386/i486/ everywhere.

However -- as always -- the problem is one of perception, and '*.i386.rpm'
signifies something quite different than '*.i486.rpm' no matter what instructions
are actually used within the package.


Perhaps we need to change the perception in order to lose linux threads forever.

Again, I know quite well more pain than gain, fixing all the bleeping scripts
that have embedded i386/* and/or *.i386.rpm, to know 'i486' is gonna break
a whole lot of process.


But perhaps it's time to signify Something Else Instead.

73 de Jeff


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux